Mass tort lawsuit · Checked on November 3, 2026
Dupixent lawsuit (T-cell lymphoma): status November 2026
Yes, the Dupixent lawsuit is active. A new federal MDL, number 3180, had 40 pending Dupixent lawsuits on November 2, 2026. Plaintiffs allege that Dupixent (dupilumab) caused cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), including mycosis fungoides. The litigation is at a very early stage.
| Case | MDL 3180 |
|---|---|
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Judge | Zahid N. Quraishi |
| Pending cases | 40 (as of November 2, 2026) |
| Stage | Very early stage; MDL created June 2026 |
| New cases | Law firms are filing new cases |
| Next scheduled date | None announced in the records we checked |
| Last checked | November 3, 2026 |
What plaintiffs allege
Plaintiffs allege that Regeneron and Sanofi failed to warn that Dupixent could cause or unmask cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The companies deny the claims.
Where the case stands
- The MDL was created in June 2026 and is before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi in New Jersey (verified, JPML report; creation date reported).
- The court held its initial case management conference on October 1, 2026 (reported).
Settlement status
No settlement had been announced as of November 3, 2026. We report a settlement only when a court order, a company filing or a company statement confirms it, and we never estimate payment amounts.
Updates
Newest first. Each entry says whether we read the record ourselves (verified) or it comes from coverage (reported).
- November 2026: The federal panel's report of November 2, 2026 listed 40 pending cases (verified, JPML report).
- October 2026: The court held its initial case management conference on October 1 (reported).
- October 2026: The federal panel's report of October 1, 2026 listed 38 pending cases (verified, JPML report).
- June 2026: The federal panel created MDL 3180 in New Jersey (reported).
What law firms commonly ask callers
Law firms reviewing these cases usually ask about the following. This is general information, not an assessment of any claim:
- what Dupixent was prescribed for and when it started
- whether a pathology report confirmed CTCL, mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome
- the diagnosis date
Questions
Is the Dupixent lawsuit real?
Yes. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation listed 40 pending cases in MDL 3180 as of November 2, 2026 (verified). A pending case is a claim filed in court, not a finding that the claim is true.
When will the Dupixent lawsuit settle?
Nobody can predict when or whether a mass tort will settle. What has been disclosed so far: No settlement had been announced as of November 3, 2026. We report a settlement only when a court order, a company filing or a company statement confirms it, and we never estimate payment amounts.
Can Dupixent cause cancer?
That is what the lawsuits allege, and the companies deny it. No court has made a final decision on that question. For medical questions, talk to your doctor.
What is CTCL?
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is a rare cancer of white blood cells that first shows up in the skin. Mycosis fungoides is its most common form.
Sources
- JPML, Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending, November 2, 2026 verified
- HarrisMartin on the JPML order centralizing Dupixent cases reported
Verified means we read the court, agency or company record ourselves on the check date. Reported means the fact comes from news or law firm coverage and could not be confirmed on a primary record.